Interlocutor? <g> Interesting use of the word, Warren. Minstrel shows just don't seem to be in vogue anymore either.
I am truly sorry, if I misunderstood your statement of.... "Besides Spins are also ACCIDENTS. That was why FAA wanted them in your flight training. Warren" I do apologize, if I upset you in any way. Spin training can impress/effect students in unintended ways. Usually it is positive, as in your case... Or simply scares the crap out of others that will never, ever return to fly again. Hopefully, we never lose a budding aviator in this manner any more. Yes, this is just my opinion - after nearly a half century of flight and........ fright. Best wishes, Bob U. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sir, Some of us are maybe not interlocutor Some maybe. But the spin part > was about a 1969-70 design of M-10. Not about FAA Today. Stall, Spin training > was vogue. As it was into the ' 80's Mooney had an airplane they wanted for > a trainer. Training pilots to use the paddles. Their A2-A with rudder on the > tips of the horiz. didn't look like the rest of their line. Pure and simple. > I personally was not talking of the pro's or con's of stalls or spins. I like > some others here trained (as you did) to know what to do. Yes, low and slow > can bust your a--. But knowing what happened in that configuration has helped > me to be more discern. By your e-mail it is obvious that you think that the > rapid, swirling of terra firma is unimportant to developing student. It sure > got my attention. Watching the earth twisting the Alt. unwinding. Yes, Dad > did me a grate service by showing me what I didn't want to happen to me Slow > and Low. Thank for helping me remember my roots. Son of a good mender. Yours, > Warren Hampton
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
