On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Jon Nelson writes: > > > Is there any reason why using hardlinks to accomplish the COPY operation > > is not feasible? IMAP never futzes with the /content/ of messages, only > > the /filename/, right? > > May not work with shared folders.
Hmm. Can you be more specific? I have an ugly patch that does the hardlinking. It could fall back to the current copy methodology if the link fails, or if shared folders are being used. I'm curious, though, esp. about why shared folders would be a problem. -- Applying computer technology is simply finding the right wrench to pound in the correct screw. Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
