On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Jon Nelson writes: > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > >> Jon Nelson writes: > >> > >> > Is there any reason why using hardlinks to accomplish the COPY operation > >> > is not feasible? IMAP never futzes with the /content/ of messages, only > >> > the /filename/, right? > >> > >> May not work with shared folders. > > > > Hmm. Can you be more specific? I have an ugly patch that does the > > Messages in shared folders use soft links. Creating a hard link to a soft > link brings wildly different results on different platforms. On some > platforms the soft link is duplicated; on other platforms the soft link is > hardlinked.
OK. I'll add such logic to my patch. Don't use hardlinks in shared folders. -- Applying computer technology is simply finding the right wrench to pound in the correct screw. Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
