On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Julian Mehnle wrote: > Jon Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Eduardo Roldan wrote: > > > The article talks about compatibility between SPF and SenderID. In > > > resume it says that SPF dns records are compatible with SenderID. So > > > now we can deploy SPF without fear of remake all again. > > > > However, it also says that the new records *can* be published in XML. > > That's right. XML. In DNS. Oh Goody! If anything will kill easy and > > widespread adoption of something it's **XML** in *DNS*. > > So just don't publish in XML.
> The MARID working group has already dropped > the XML format, so Sender ID doesn't have a chance of becoming an official > Internet standard as long as it uses the XML format. I didn't know that (yet). That's awesome. > In any case, publishing SPF records in the classic format can currently be > considered a safe bet. Good. Thanks for the update! -- Ensign Walnut approaches Dr. Crusher with caution... Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
