On Sunday 10 March 2013 09.52:56 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Dan Johansson writes:
> 
> > On Saturday 09 March 2013 11.37:01 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > Dan Johansson writes:
> > >
> > > > The only error that I can see in the courier-logs is the following in
> > > > courierlocal.log:
> > > >
> > > > Mar  9 16:02:05 torsson.dmj.nu courierlocal:
> > > > id=00000000006F3BA5.00000000513B4EED.0000337B,from=<bmw-mcs-list-
> > > > ow...@dmj.nu>,addr=<bmw-mcs-list-moder...@dmj.nu>: Invalid moderation
> > > > message.
> > > > Mar  9 16:02:05 torsson.dmj.nu courierlocal:
> > > > id=00000000006F3BA5.00000000513B4EED.0000337B,from=<bmw-mcs-list-
> > > > ow...@dmj.nu>,addr=<bmw-mcs-list-moder...@dmj.nu>,status: deferred
> > > >
> > > > I have tried with different "From" addresses but I always get the same  
> > error
> > > > message "Invalid moderation message".
> > >
> > > It's not the From address. It's irrelevant. The moderation reply is  
> > garbled.
> > >
> > > Make sure your mail client is including the text of the moderation notice 
> > >  
> > in
> > > your reply.
> > >
> > > And, this should really be an immediate bounce, instead of a deferral. 
> > > I'll
> > > fix that.
> > That is interesting. I have tried a few things but always get the same  
> > result.
> > Here is what I have tried:
> > 1)  Plain "Reply"
> > 2)  Replay, with removing of my signature
> > 3)  Reply, remove everything except the two last lines of the original  
> > mail (the one containing the "id" of the message)
> > 4)  Reply, removing the ">" in from of the last two lines.
> >
> > My next step is to try to install another E-mail client and try the reply  
> > from there.
> >
> > Any other suggestion on how to debug this?
> 
> Hard to say, without seeing the raw message itself.
> 
> Perhaps the mail client is doing something stupid, like base64-encoding the  
> entire reply, even if it contains ASCII-only content.
> 
> I suppose that, given the trend of mail clients spewing out disgusting  
> garbage like that, with nobody noticing because it displays normally, it  
> might be necessary to do more work. Maybe a few releases down the line.
> 
> In the meantime, your other alternative is to install webmlm, and moderate  
> via the web browser. The webmlmd man pages walks you through the process of  
> doing that.
> 
> Then, you could fiddle with the moderation notice template to include the  
> webmlm's URL, so from any moderation notice you can jump into webmlm, and  
> handle it.

Hi Sam,

First of all thanks for your support.

To by able to "see" what is going on I changed the ".courier-list-default" file 
for the mailing-list user to the following:
| cat >/tmp/courier-list-default.$$
| /usr/bin/couriermlm ctlmsg /home/bmw-mcs/couriermlm

And here is the output of the "cat":

Received: from queen.localnet (queen.dmj.nu [192.168.1.11])
  by dmj.nu with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:47:38 +0100
  id 000000000040CB70.00000000513C9D0A.0000321A
From: Dan Johansson <bmw-mcs-list-ow...@dmj.nu>
To: bmw-mcs-list-moder...@dmj.nu
Subject: Re: Moderations-Anfrage
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:47:37 +0100
Message-ID: <2455134.XAj1sPWt7Z@queen>
User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.7.10-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <courier.00000000513bf7e5.00006...@dmj.nu>
References: <courier.00000000513bf7e5.00006...@dmj.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-message-flag: Using Microsoft software might be a security risk

[0123456748.11801.torsson]
[XXXXXXXXLCJJHCILNHHPIJHPOHKDNCFM]


For me it looks Ok - no base64 or other stuff here.

What I now tried was to cat this file "into" couriermlm :

$ cat courier-list-default.12830  | /usr/bin/couriermlm ctlmsg 
/home/bmw-mcs/couriermlm
Invalid address.

And as you can see it returns "Invalid address".
Which address is invalid?

Regards,
-- 
Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu>
***************************************************
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!
***************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to