Interesting! What license would you suggest is a better culture/ethose fit?
-Alex On Monday, February 22, 2010, Andrius Kulikauskas <m...@ms.lt> wrote: > Congratulations on setting up http://coworking.com > > I noted this: All material is suggested to be shared under Creative Commons > Share-Alike Attribution license, unless specifically cited by the author. > > The Share Alike license is a very regressive license and is very disruptive > for Public Domain content. It insists that any work that it gets included in > must also be Share Alike. For example, I have made great efforts to organize > my Minciu Sodas laboratory's venues in the Public Domain. If somebody sends > a letter using the Share Alike license, or includes an excerpt using the > Share Alike license - including anything from coworking.com - then by the > terms of the license, we would have to delete it, or our entire archive would > leave the Public Domain. > > Please think about what the license says. And then choose to use another > license! > > Co-working is about sharing. Share alike is not. It's an unfortunate fad. > > Andrius > > Andrius Kulikauskas > Minciu Sodas > http://www.ms.lt > m...@ms.lt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Coworking" group. > To post to this group, send email to cowork...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en. > > -- /ah indyhall.org coworking in philadelphia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To post to this group, send email to cowork...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
