On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:15:10PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said: > >> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html > >> > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem. > >> Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the > >> testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a > >> broken and so far unstopped broken test machine. > > > > But this is one of Chris's reports, not APOCAL's. > > Yes -- that pretty clearly should have been discarded and not sent at > all. There's something about 'prereq_data' not being recognized. > > Aha! EekBoek bundles M::B 0.28, which didn't have 'prereq_data'. > > Chris -- I think CPANPLUS needs to check the exit code of 'Build > prereq_data' and fall back on scraping _build/prereqs if it's not OK. > Never underestimate the ability of authors/users to find the wrong > module, I guess. :-)
And there I was thinking I had already done that in CPANPLUS::Dist::Build
which is the culprit
Revision history for Perl extension CPANPLUS::Dist::Build.
0.44 Wed Nov 18 12:37:03 GMT 2009
- Make the prereq resolving fallback to _build/ querying
if the 'prereq_data' action fails. Spotted by Johan Vromans.
*sigh*
--
Chris Williams
aka BinGOs
PGP ID 0x4658671F
http://www.gumbynet.org.uk
==========================
pgp9Bc7TSqyoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
