If I am not mistaken you are looking for the data I referred to yesterday http://stats.cpantesters.org/mplatforms.html when I was looking for a graph to see the trends in number of reports / OS (or rather platform). Sinan linked to a script extracting the data from the HTML, but I have not had time to create a graph from it yet.
Gabor On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Dean Hamstead <d...@fragfest.com.au> wrote: > Hi All > > I was looking to fire up some cpan smokers, but adding yet another linux > i386/amd64 smoker probably isnt needed. In the past i have run DragonflyBSD > and OpenBSD smokers. > > Looking through the list it's clear that there is a lot of coverage across > a lot of different platforms, but its not clear which ones are deficient > etc. > > On top of os+arch, there are also obviously a range of different ways you > can compile perl - made far easier with perlbrew - which also need testing. > > Hence I wonder if there is something a matrix that shows deficiencies in > testing coverage, which will give people like myself a quick list of > platforms we could fire up in a VM (or old hardware we could > beg/borrow/steal/ebay) > > I guess in an ideal world, list out every known supported OS and hardware, > then multiply that out by all the different perl compilation variations. > From that list it could then be determined which platforms are keeping up > with the testing and which are lagging behind. That list could then give > the curious and willing something to work with? > > Dean >
