>>>>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:49:14 +1000, Dean Hamstead <d...@fragfest.com.au> >>>>> said:
> Hi All > I was looking to fire up some cpan smokers, but adding yet another > linux i386/amd64 smoker probably isnt needed. In the past i have run > DragonflyBSD and OpenBSD smokers. Both Dragonfly and OpenBSD often have no results in the bleadperl range. That would be nice to see. > Looking through the list it's clear that there is a lot of coverage > across a lot of different platforms, but its not clear which ones are > deficient etc. > On top of os+arch, there are also obviously a range of different ways > you can compile perl - made far easier with perlbrew - which also need > testing. > Hence I wonder if there is something a matrix that shows deficiencies > in testing coverage, which will give people like myself a quick list > of platforms we could fire up in a VM (or old hardware we could > beg/borrow/steal/ebay) If I had the tuits I would fire up open indiana. Unless you beat me to it:) -- andreas
