On 05/24/2010 09:03 PM, vishal bayskar wrote:
After some analysis I found, in my case python bindings generated contains line: typedef bp::class_< CallResult< Simple>, boost::noncopyable> CallResult_less__Simple__greater__exposer_t; I could not understand why boost::noncopyable is added as an extra template parameter and this seems to be be culprit in my case.
It definitely is the culprit. The error you see is Boost.Python doing exactly what the code generator told it to do.
I don't think my class contains object of any class which is derived from boost::noncopyable. Can you please suggest, what I am missing in this case? http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664090/structEx.tar.gz structEx.tar.gz
I didn't see anything attached to your email, and my tar doesn't like what's at the link above. I'm not sure whatever binding generator you're using (Py++?) uses to determine whether to thrown noncopyable in, there, but I suspect it would do so if you don't have a public copy constructor defined available, even if you didn't use boost::noncopyable to get rid of it.
Maybe you can try posting the example again? Jim Bosch _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
