On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:46 AM, vishal bayskar <vishal.bays...@nechclst.in> wrote: > > >>I didn't see anything attached to your email, and my tar doesn't like >>what's at the link above. I'm not sure whatever binding generator >>you're using (Py++?) uses to determine whether to thrown noncopyable in, >>there, but I suspect it would do so if you don't have a public copy >>constructor defined available, even if you didn't use boost::noncopyable >>to get rid of it. > >>Maybe you can try posting the example again? > > zip file is attached below > http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/structEx.zip structEx.zip > > I am also attaching important files > structEx.cpp > http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/structEx.cpp structEx.cpp > > ex.py > http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/ex.py ex.py > > I have used py++ (latest version) for code generation
Please post a small and complete code directly to the mailing list. Did you try to remove "noncopyable" from the generated code? If so what happened? If you think, that py++ wrong, you can always override its decision: mb = module_builder_t( ... ) mb.class_(...).noncopyable = False HTH -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
