>I didn't see anything attached to your email, and my tar doesn't like >what's at the link above. I'm not sure whatever binding generator >you're using (Py++?) uses to determine whether to thrown noncopyable in, >there, but I suspect it would do so if you don't have a public copy >constructor defined available, even if you didn't use boost::noncopyable >to get rid of it.
>Maybe you can try posting the example again? zip file is attached below http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/structEx.zip structEx.zip I am also attaching important files structEx.cpp http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/structEx.cpp structEx.cpp ex.py http://old.nabble.com/file/p28664525/ex.py ex.py I have used py++ (latest version) for code generation -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/No-to_python-%28by-value%29-converter-found-for-C%2B%2B-type-tp28664090p28664525.html Sent from the Python - c++-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
