On Thu, 01 Mar 2001 09:41:01 -0800, lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Spirito wrote: > > > > > Why should this impress us? Do you always break things down into left & > > right? Ralph Nader & Pat Buchanan can't /both/ be wrong about trade, can > > they? Oh, my. > > > Since they both have the SAME opinion (crypto-fascist uber-nationalism > disguised as populism) why not? My point is that they ARE both wrong about trade despite a) being associated with opposite poles of the political spectrum; & b) largely agreeing with each other. That is, citing the agreement of leftists is no proof a conservative is correct. Paul
- Independent Institute Response To Phillip Hallam-Bake... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Phillip Ha... Paul Spirito
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Philli... lizard
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Paul Spirito
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Philli... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Response T... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Independent Institute Respo... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Respo... James A. Donald
- RE: Independent Institute R... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Why Not debate "ne... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Jim Choate
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... David Theroux
