It occurred to me that this would be a good topic for an organized
online debate. The results of which could be posted around.
Jim Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or "Jonathan Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
would make good and fair moderators- Jonathan especially so since he
has already participated in a similar debate on my mailing list and
on his online zine The Ethical Spectacle http://www.spectacle.org/ .
In that debate- Both participants were lawyers so they wrote rather
extensive and good ground rules for the debate. But any trusted
third party would work.
A debate such as this will remove any "heat of the moment" commentary
and might provide more light than heat?
What do you think?
Regards, Matthew Gaylor-
**************************************************************************
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week)
Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229
(614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/
**************************************************************************
