Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm not defending the L-M work. Even if I were so inclined, I read it years ago and I'm sure my memory has faded. I was merely pointing out a flaw in your argument against it. The two are distinct. -Declan
- Independent Institute Response To Phillip Hallam-Bake... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Phillip Ha... Paul Spirito
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Philli... lizard
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Paul Spirito
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Philli... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Response T... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Independent Institute Respo... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Respo... James A. Donald
- RE: Independent Institute R... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Why Not debate "ne... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Jim Choate
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... David Theroux
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... James A. Donald
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Jim Warren
- RE: Why Not debate &quo... Phillip Hallam-Baker
