--
At 09:23 PM 3/4/2001 -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> David,
>
> You still don't get it. 'Read my book' is not a valid move in
> a debate. If you were to stand up in front of the Oxford
> Union and say 'my book proves the case entirely' then sat
> down with no further elaboration you lose the debate.
This depends on the relative status of the debaters. Your status as an
expert is perhaps less than you perceive it to be.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
7nyEypwoXGtjljpB281LxgekQkbzCtLPiWYid99E
4L9TA3M8sE2epY4cVpAqzGwPC9S1AKAsQ7SuF2+nq
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Philli... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Independent Institute Response T... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Independent Institute Response T... James A. Donald
- RE: Independent Institute Respo... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Why Not debate "networ... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... Jim Choate
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... David Theroux
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... James A. Donald
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... Jim Warren
- RE: Why Not debate "ne... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: CDR: RE: Why Not debate... Jim Choate
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Phillip ... Ken Brown
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Phillip Hallam-... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Phillip Ha... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Philli... Colin A. Reed
- Re: Independent Institute Response To Philli... lizard
- RE: Independent Institute Response To Ph... Phillip Hallam-Baker
