At 08:33 PM 3/22/02 -0600, Aimee Farr wrote: >Tim wrote: >> Don't hire a single lawyer. As soon as even a single lawyer is hired,
>> you're lost. Because it means you're thinking in terms of using the >> legal system, of striking business deals with those whose products you >> napster, and with working within the system. >> >> Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ with a lawyer, means >> you are fully aware of how much you are relying on the laws of >> mathematics rather than the laws of men. > >"I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader "Read the source, Luke" >What happens if you break the laws of mathematics? Jah gets *really* pissed. >Or, does couching a >choice of law between the "laws of men," and "the laws of mathematics" smack >of some fallacy? Been fellating a lot of legislative numerical illiterates recently, have we Aimee? >Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ (emphasis his) a lawyer, >more truly means you are a complete moron and disdain even calculated risk. No, it means you're observant and have discounted the lawhores. >If you break the law by a significant act in that direction, you set your >own hook for co-option, especially in espionage. What if you do no wrong, but the RIAA/MPAA brings heavy artillery upon you? Naah, can't happen here, Suzy Creamcheese. >Most of the information you need is open >source, Dream on >or can be gained by acumen with low-risk. Add in the traitor element >and the "go to jail" consideration, and it looks like a no-go to me. We have some questions about the optimal voltage/flow rate used when electro-spraying CO2 & nutrient deprived anthrax cultures...
