Dear Robert, All,

To my understanding the basic difference of an archival institution, in contrast to a more general notion of an archive as a collection of papers etc, is the mandate to safeguard records of another institution about their actions. This is expressed in keeping records completely and without gaps in an order reflecting the sequence of actions. This is also attempted when recovering such material from the past.

This creates a different focus of the relation of the structure of the collection and that of its creation events, and of the inheritance of metadata in the collection hierarchy and the action hierarchy.

Otherwise, I think CRM is very adequate, and the above should not be difficult to be modeled.

Best,

Martin

On 1/27/2020 7:40 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:

Yes indeed! I was very happy to see your emails about this in the past 😊

Our lead archivist is also progressive and looking to shift the attention of her staff to be more valuable for discovery and access of digitized representations of the physical objects, but culture is the hard part rather than technology of course.

Rob

*From: *Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Maria Jose de Almeida <m-jose.alme...@dglab.gov.pt>
*Date: *Monday, January 27, 2020 at 9:10 AM
*To: *"crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
*Subject: *Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ?

The Portuguese National Archives are working on a new data model for archival description with CIDOC-CRM… I guess Portuguese archivists are coming to realize that it is indeed an improvement to the archival practices :-)

We presented the project at the 2018 annual conference in Herklion: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2594705

On 27/01/20 16:44, Robert Sanderson wrote:

    I actually think that traditional archiving practices /are/ a
    different “sect” … or less controversially: the non-digital
    archival practices of the North American tradition do not map
    cleanly into a more precise ontology such as CIDOC-CRM that is
    designed for expressing knowledge about specifics, rather than the
    broad generalities of “collection description”.

    In particular the distinction between the objects as managed
    physical things and the objects as the members of an intellectual
    hierarchy is very important in CRM (IMO) and very complicated to
    tease apart from current data in archival systems.

    I believe that trying to force the very general archival patterns
    into a very specific CRM model would meet a lot of resistance from
    many institutions, and even if we think that would be an
    improvement to the archival practices, the archivists need to come
    to that realization for themselves.

    Rob

    *From: *Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr>
    <mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Martin Doerr
    <mar...@ics.forth.gr> <mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>
    *Date: *Monday, January 27, 2020 at 1:53 AM
    *To: *"crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" <mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
    <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> <mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
    *Subject: *Re: [Crm-sig] The archivists are (stil) a different sect ?

    On 1/27/2020 10:23 AM, Dan Matei wrote:

        https://www.ica.org/standards/RiC/ontology.html

        Great :-(

        Dan

        _______________________________________________

        Crm-sig mailing list

        Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr  <mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>

        http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

    Well, they write:

    "adding suggestions of mappings (in rico:closeTo) and OWL
    equivalences between some classes or properties and components in
    other models (among which - this is not an exhaustive list-
    CIDOC-CRM, IFLA-LRM, PREMIS, PROV-O, and Schema.org)"

    .....

--
    ------------------------------------

      Dr. Martin Doerr

      Honorary Head of the

      Center for Cultural Informatics

      Information Systems Laboratory

      Institute of Computer Science

      Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

      N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,

      GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece

      Vox:+30(2810)391625

 Email:mar...@ics.forth.gr <mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>  Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
        

    *CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Getty. Do not
    click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and
    know the content is safe.*




--

Maria José de Almeida

Técnica Superior

_Direção de Serviços de Inovação e Administração Eletrónica

_Telefone (direto): 210 037 343

_Telefone (geral):  210 037 100

_m-jose.alme...@dglab.gov.pt <mailto:m-jose.alme...@dglab.gov.pt>

Image removed by sender.

        

*CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Getty. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.*




_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to