Thanks Christian-Emil and Martin. I will use then E4 and P7 (regretfully :-)
My impression is that the combination E92, P160 & P161 is a more elegant solution. But, rules are rules... Best, Dan -----Original Message----- From: Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr> List-Post: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:13:52 +0200 > As Christian-Emil also pointed out, this is a wrong use of E92. > > The scope note says: "This class comprises 4 dimensional point sets > (volumes) in physical spacetime....". > > Do you regard that what makes up the identity and substance of the > Byzantine Period is to be a set of points? > > best, > > Martin > > On 3/19/2019 10:27 AM, Dan Matei wrote: > > Hi fiends, > > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 19:20, Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr> wrote: > > > >> Nevertheless, we used the term informally in the CRM. We could name E92 as > >> "abstract". > > For me, some E92 are not abstract. E.g. I instantiate "Byzantine > > Period" (it is somwhat difficult to place it in South America :-) : > > > > <#ByzantinePeriod> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume> > > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <330-1700> > > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#EsternEurope> > > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Levant> > > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#NorthAfrica> > > > > Also: > > > > <#BronzeAge1> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume> > > <#BronzeAge1> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept> > > <#BronzeAge1> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?1> > > <#BronzeAge1><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#JapaneseIslands> > > > > <#BronzeAge2> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume> > > <#BronzeAge2> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept> > > <#BronzeAge2> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?2> > > <#BronzeAge2><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Scandinavia> > > > > Should I worry ? > > > > Dan
