...apologies for writing piecewise!
Here some arguments for and against a Linguistic Appellation:
A) In order for an Appellation to become language specific, does it need
some special traits?
Can an Identifier become language specific? A place primitive?
If not, there must be more to such an Appellation, that is in favor
of a subclass.
B) is being language specific unique? Can names belong to 3 languages,
but not to others?
C) How does an instance of Linguistic Appellation comes into being: If
it is acquired later, it would be an accidental property, not essential.
Then the Linguistic Appellation would have a potential to become part of
a language.
The Human Made Feature comes into being in this combination exclusively.
D) Question: May be the language of an Appellation is a different
property from that of an Linguistic Object, it may be like an adoption
to genetic descendence. Is that difference relevant? Or do we
distinguish a name being commonly known as in some language from being
formed in that language (such as "Köln")?
Best
Martin
On 11/8/2022 9:37 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
Apologies, I missed some messages in this thread...😅. Indeed
"Human-Made Feature" is an interesting case. I prefer to review the
arguments for Human-Made Feature, Human-Made Object. They are actually
more complex, because feautures and objects differ wrt to Move, "bears
feature" etc.
I prefer also a discussion to add more custom classes to the RDFS,
such as "Active Destruction", rather that inceasing CRMbase.
Best,
Martin
On 11/8/2022 9:20 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
I just want to remind that we have a principle explicitly in the
introduction of the CRM not to add classes without distinct
properties of their own which is sufficiently relevant. By this, we
purged a lot of very useful classes from the CRM, because it is "base".
I prefer not to hear again "if we don't like a class". I kindly ask
members to delete such terms from our vocabulary.
Any argument in favour of a class in CRMbase which is nothing more
semantics than multiple IsA, must be measured by this principle, and
not by likes.
If the principle is to be abandoned again, please make an issue. If
the principle is unclear, please make an issue.
Any issue for adding more custom classes to RDFS, to be discussed.
Best,
Martin
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
