Dear all, In the work with the cleanup of the definition document for CRMarcheo, I found a comment (written by myself) next to
AP5 removed part or all of (was partially or totally removed by) Domain: A1<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gemIVVKyVULkTNT73_iBvV53fjQUM6hYKw_D_tBstKI/edit#heading=h.nmf14n> Excavation Processing Unit Range: A8<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gemIVVKyVULkTNT73_iBvV53fjQUM6hYKw_D_tBstKI/edit#heading=h.2szc72q> Stratigraphic Unit Subproperty of: P31 has modified (was modified by) The comment is as follows (17.09.2020): DECISION: the sig will start a new issue regarding the superproperty of AP5. Candidates involve P31 has modified (D: E11 Modification; R: E18 Physical Thing). Any decision will affect the definition of A1 Excavation Process[ing] Unit ( see issue 446). The new issue should be of a more general interest than the particulars of AP5’s superproperty, and address the question of declaring superproperties in the CRMbase exclusively (to the extent it’s possible) or across family models. HW: CEO (?) to check the CRMbase properties that generalize to CRM extensions. (this is the content of new issue) Which issue is the 'new issue' referred to? Best, Christian-Emil
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
