One more question: Can a wildfire trigger the destruction of a house, or does 
the burning down of the house form a part of the wildfire event? In other 
words, is there a difference of nature or is the destruction a continuation of 
the kinds of processes of the wildfire?


> Am 21.04.2023 um 12:59 schrieb Wolfgang Schmidle via Crm-sig 
> <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>:
> 
> Here's a diff:
> 
> * label: 
> OLD   O13 triggers (is triggered by)
> NEW   O13 triggered (was triggered by)
> (in the examples it was already called "triggered" rather than "triggers")
> 
> * scope note: 
> Part 1 is unchanged:
> This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another 
> instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction between 
> events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target system that 
> is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an unstable 
> mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or earthquake.
> 
> Part 2:
> OLD   In that sense the triggering event is interpreted as a cause. However, 
> the association of the two events is based on their temporal proximity, with 
> the triggering event ending when the triggered event starts.
> 
> NEW   The distinction of the triggering event from the triggered one lies in 
> their difference of nature: The starting of the triggered event is the result 
> of an interaction of constituents with the triggering one, but not a 
> continuation of the kinds of processes of the latter. Therefore the 
> triggering event must spatiotemporally overlap with the initial time and area 
> of the triggered event, and the spreading out of the subsequent phenomena 
> must initiate from this area and time and not from multiple independent areas.
> 
> * FOL: 
> O13(x,y) ⇒ P182(x,y) removed
> 
> (Domain, range, quantification, examples are unchanged)
> 
> 
> About the changes:
> 
> Scope note part 2: If there needs to be an interaction of constituents and 
> thus a spatiotemporal overlap, then I am not sure I understand the 1966 flood 
> example. There is an overlap between the flood and a book getting wet and an 
> overlap between a book being wet as a result and the growing of the mould, 
> but is there an obvious interaction between the flood and the mould beginning 
> to grow on a book? I am assuming O13 is not meant to be transitive?
> 
> What is the initial time and area of "mould growth on books stored in flooded 
> library rooms"? Is it obvious that this area is connected and not multiple 
> independent areas?
> 
> FOL / superproperties: The new scope note suggests P132 "spatiotemporally 
> overlaps with", as well as P176 "starts before the start of" (also suggested 
> by Thanasis) and  P173i "ends after or with the start of"?
> 
> Additional questions:
> 
> Scope note part 1: What is the sustained tension in the target system (books 
> stored in library rooms) in the 1966 flood example? Or in a house that is 
> destroyed by an earthquake or a wildfire?
> 
> Examples: Since we want to get rid of fictitious examples, would it make 
> sense to replace the earthquake/landslide example? Non-fictitious examples 
> would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise,_California#2018_fire or 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_Things_Go (an artistic cascade of 
> triggering events)
> 
> Best,
> Wolfgang
> 
> 
>> Am 20.04.2023 um 14:01 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig 
>> <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>:
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Here my first go:
>> 
>> OLD
>> 
>> O13 triggers (is triggered by)
>> 
>> Domain:
>> E5 Event
>> Range:
>> E5 Event
>> Quantification:
>> many to many (0,n:0,n)
>> 
>> Scope note:
>> This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another 
>> instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction between 
>> events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target system that 
>> is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an unstable 
>> mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or earthquake. In 
>> that sense the triggering event is interpreted as a cause. However, the 
>> association of the two events is based on their temporal proximity, with the 
>> triggering event ending when the triggered event starts.
>> 
>> Examples:
>>  The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 triggered the rotational landslide that 
>> was observed along the road on the same day. (fictitious)
>>  The explosion at the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain) 
>> triggered the rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007 (Vilajosana et 
>> al., 2008).
>>  The 1966 flood in Florence triggered mould growth on books stored in 
>> flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)
>> In First Order Logic:
>> O13(x,y) ⇒ E5(x)
>> O13(x,y) ⇒ E5(y)
>> O13(x,y) ⇒ P182(x,y)
>> 
>> NEW
>> 
>> O13 triggered (was triggered by)
>> 
>> Domain:
>> E5 Event
>> Range:
>> E5 Event
>> Quantification:
>> many to many (0,n:0,n)
>> 
>> Scope note:
>> This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another 
>> instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction between 
>> events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target system that 
>> is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an unstable 
>> mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or earthquake.
>> 
>> The distinction of the triggering event from the triggered one lies in their 
>> difference of nature: The starting of the triggered event is the result of 
>> an interaction of constituents with the triggering one, but not a 
>> continuation of the kinds of processes of the latter. Therefore the 
>> triggering event must spatiotemporally overlap with the initial time and 
>> area of the triggered event, and the spreading out of the subsequent 
>> phenomena must initiate from this area and time and not from multiple 
>> independent areas.
>> 
>> Examples:
>>  The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 triggered the rotational landslide that 
>> was observed along the road on the same day. (fictitious)
>>  The explosion at the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain) 
>> triggered the rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007 (Vilajosana et 
>> al., 2008).
>>  The 1966 flood in Florence triggered mould growth on books stored in 
>> flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)
>> In First Order Logic:
>> O13(x,y) ⇒ E5(x)
>> O13(x,y) ⇒ E5(y)
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ------------------------------------
>> Dr. Martin Doerr
>> 
>> Honorary Head of the                                                         
>>           
>> Center for Cultural Informatics
>> 
>> Information Systems Laboratory  
>> Institute of Computer Science             
>> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   
>> 
>> N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,         
>> GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece 
>> 
>> Vox:+30(2810)391625  
>> Email: 
>> mar...@ics.forth.gr
>> 
>> Web-site: 
>> http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crm-sig mailing list
>> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
>> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to