Thanks Adolfo, and yes, I've just noticed that my entire eclipse ssh access is completely down, period. I think it might have been one too many git automated bad login. I've put a bug in for Matt and Dennis to take a look. I can't help thinking that there is a powerful force in the space-time continuum that just doesn't want amp in the Juno release.
On 2012-05-09, at 2:24 PM, Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo wrote: > Hello Miles, > > Perhaps your IP has been banned in somehow. > > I''ve got a similar problem last week -> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378451 > > Send an email to Dennis with your IP address so that he can verify it's not > banned. > > Cheers, > Adolfo. > > 2012/5/9 Miles Parker <[email protected]> > > Meanwhile, I can't seem to ssh to the amp repos to make a four character > change. Sigh.. Has anyone run into an issue? I can get there with git and > http, just not with ssh, where I get a timeout. (I haven't tried to push in > the last few months so perhaps something changed on the servers -- the URI > I'm using is using the exact same format as my other repos which work fine.) > > On 2012-05-09, at 2:04 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: > >> I take that back. We have a fix that will allow the community to test the >> CDT with the Windows gcc compilers. I need to do a new build and submit it. >> Looks like that'll take an hour or so. >> >> Sorry, >> Doug. >> >> From: Doug Schaefer <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 3:58 PM >> To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 >> >> BTW, CDT is good to go. The next time the aggregator runs it'll pick up our >> new build. >> >> Cheers, >> Doug. >> >> From: Doug Schaefer <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:13 PM >> To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 >> >> CDT is scrambling to fix some major issues. We may ask for more time. >> Hopefully not. >> >> Thanks, >> Doug >> >> From: David M Williams <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:11 PM >> To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 >> >> Reminder ... it is +3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will be "cut-off" >> unless someone asks for a few extra hours. >> >> I removed the emf compare feature from modeling category, since it was cause >> build to fail. If there is some other one that's supposed to be there, >> please add it back. >> >> The following still have disabled repositories or features: >> >> amp.b3aggrcon >> equinox.b3aggrcon >> jetty.b3aggrcon >> mft.b3aggrcon >> riena.b3aggrcon >> virgo.b3aggrcon >> >> Any word? >> >> I can speak to the equinox one. See bug 378735[1]. It is related to the >> org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id "product". I _think_ I can add it back for RC1. But >> is anyone using it? Can anyone document a use case? It has not been >> working/available for all of Juno, so far, and no one has really complained, >> and no one seems to have a clear id of if or why its needed. >> So, I know it'd be short notice to remove it ... but ... would also >> appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed. >> >> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735 >> >> >> <graycol.gif>David M Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---Thanks for >> replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current aggregation builds >> are failing ou >> >> From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS >> To: [email protected], Cross project issues >> <[email protected]>, >> Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 >> Sent by: [email protected] >> >> >> >> Thanks for replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current >> aggregation builds are failing out-of-the-gate saying there is a problem >> with the model, at the emf.compare in the "modeling category" does not refer >> to the right one. And, apparently comes from several sources? (at least in >> past?) so ... is there supposed to be _any_ emf.compare in Juno? Or is it >> completely gone? If the later, I'll just remove it from the category. If the >> the former ... I'll have to hunt around for which is "the right one" and use >> it (so, hoping someone knows off the top of their head). >> >> FYI, this can be seen by using the b3 aggregator editor, selecting the top >> level "aggregation" note, and then running the "validate" command from >> context menu. (Not even "validate aggregation", just "validate" which just >> validates the XML and EMF model). >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Laurent Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 AM---Hi, Sorry about the delay before >> replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). >> >> From: Laurent Goubet <[email protected]> >> To: Cross project issues <[email protected]>, >> Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM >> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 >> Sent by: [email protected] >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). >> >> emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one repository "disabled"... that was only >> a leftover from a previous milestone and did not impact M7. We've removed >> that repository from the file. >> >> Laurent Goubet >> Obeo >> >> On 06/05/2012 21:38, David M Williams wrote: >> >> Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status! >> >> First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary build from >> the Eclipse Project, so for the first time we have a pure and correct 4.2 >> repo. In the past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping in" through >> aggregation due to the way the platform was producing and partially >> (unknowingly) combining 3.8 and 4.2. But no more, 4.2 only. >> >> One impact of this, is the bundle 'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no longer >> available ... it was actually removed in 4.1, but it is being left in the >> 3.x stream, even though 3.8 does not use it. It now correctly does _not_ >> show up in 4.2 repo via aggregation. >> >> And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled that, which rippled across 3 or 4 >> others that depend on BIRT charting. >> I hope BIRT can live without that old bundle and use the jetty server now >> provided by the platform (and used by the help system, in both 3.8 and 4.2). >> http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver >> >> Then there were the (fairly) usual breakages in RAP runtime and Virgo based >> on assumptions on certain platform specific versions, so I disabled those to >> get a green build, and promote an initial M7 version to staging. Be sure to >> check the reports (based on staging) to get as much cleaned up as possible >> before M7: >> http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/ >> >> In all, the following files have disabled repositories or features. It looks >> worse than it is, but we need to get in completely "enabled" in the next few >> days (or, remove it, if its some old thing that should not even be there any >> longer). >> >> amp.b3aggrcon >> birt.b3aggrcon >> emf-compare.b3aggrcon >> equinox.b3aggrcon >> jetty.b3aggrcon >> linuxtools.b3aggrcon >> mat.b3aggrcon >> mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon >> mft.b3aggrcon >> rap.b3aggrcon >> riena.b3aggrcon >> scout.b3aggrcon >> virgo.b3aggrcon >> >> As always questions and clarifications are welcome. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> [attachment "laurent_goubet.vcf" deleted by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM] >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> <graycol.gif>_______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > ______________________________ > Miles T. Parker > Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop > http://tasktop.com > Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo > Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP > http://milesparker.blogspot.com > skype: milestravisparker > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ______________________________ Miles T. Parker Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop http://tasktop.com Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP http://milesparker.blogspot.com skype: milestravisparker
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
