Hello Miles, Perhaps your IP has been banned in somehow.
I''ve got a similar problem last week -> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378451 Send an email to Dennis with your IP address so that he can verify it's not banned. Cheers, Adolfo. 2012/5/9 Miles Parker <[email protected]> > > Meanwhile, I can't seem to ssh to the amp repos to make a four character > change. Sigh.. Has anyone run into an issue? I can get there with git and > http, just not with ssh, where I get a timeout. (I haven't tried to push in > the last few months so perhaps something changed on the servers -- the URI > I'm using is using the exact same format as my other repos which work fine.) > > On 2012-05-09, at 2:04 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: > > I take that back. We have a fix that will allow the community to test > the CDT with the Windows gcc compilers. I need to do a new build and submit > it. Looks like that'll take an hour or so. > > Sorry, > Doug. > > From: Doug Schaefer <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 3:58 PM > To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > > BTW, CDT is good to go. The next time the aggregator runs it'll pick up > our new build. > > Cheers, > Doug. > > From: Doug Schaefer <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:13 PM > To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > > CDT is scrambling to fix some major issues. We may ask for more time. > Hopefully not. > > Thanks, > Doug > > From: David M Williams <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:11 PM > To: Cross project issues <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > > Reminder ... it is +3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will be "cut-off" > unless someone asks for a few extra hours. > > I removed the emf compare feature from modeling category, since it was > cause build to fail. If there is some other one that's supposed to be > there, please add it back. > > The following still have disabled repositories or features: > > amp.b3aggrcon > equinox.b3aggrcon > jetty.b3aggrcon > mft.b3aggrcon > riena.b3aggrcon > virgo.b3aggrcon > > Any word? > > I can speak to the equinox one. See bug 378735[1]. It is related to the > org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id "product". I _think_ I can add it back for RC1. > But is anyone using it? Can anyone document a use case? It has not been > working/available for all of Juno, so far, and no one has really > complained, and no one seems to have a clear id of if or why its needed. > So, I know it'd be short notice to remove it ... but ... would also > appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed. > > [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735 > > > <graycol.gif>David M Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---Thanks for > replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current aggregation builds > are failing ou > > From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected], Cross project issues < > [email protected]>, > Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > Thanks for replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current > aggregation builds are failing out-of-the-gate saying there is a problem > with the model, at the emf.compare in the "modeling category" does not > refer to the right one. And, apparently comes from several sources? (at > least in past?) so ... is there supposed to be _any_ emf.compare in Juno? > Or is it completely gone? If the later, I'll just remove it from the > category. If the the former ... I'll have to hunt around for which is "the > right one" and use it (so, hoping someone knows off the top of their head). > > FYI, this can be seen by using the b3 aggregator editor, selecting the top > level "aggregation" note, and then running the "validate" command from > context menu. (Not even "validate aggregation", just "validate" which just > validates the XML and EMF model). > > Thanks, > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Laurent Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 > AM---Hi, Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot o]Laurent > Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 AM---Hi, Sorry about the delay before > replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). > > From: Laurent Goubet <[email protected]> > To: Cross project issues <[email protected]>, > Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi, > > Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). > > emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one repository "disabled"... that was > only a leftover from a previous milestone and did not impact M7. We've > removed that repository from the file. > > Laurent Goubet > Obeo > > On 06/05/2012 21:38, David M Williams wrote: > > > Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status! > > First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary > build from the Eclipse Project, so for the first time we have a pure and > correct 4.2 repo. In the past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping in" > through aggregation due to the way the platform was producing and partially > (unknowingly) combining 3.8 and 4.2. But no more, 4.2 only. > > One impact of this, is the bundle 'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no > longer available ... it was actually removed in 4.1, but it is being left > in the 3.x stream, even though 3.8 does not use it. It now correctly does > _not_ show up in 4.2 repo via aggregation. > > And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled that, which rippled across 3 > or 4 others that depend on BIRT charting. > I hope BIRT can live without that old bundle and use the jetty server > now provided by the platform (and used by the help system, in both 3.8 and > 4.2). * > ** > > http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver > > *<http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver> > > Then there were the (fairly) usual breakages in RAP runtime and Virgo > based on assumptions on certain platform specific versions, so I disabled > those to get a green build, and promote an initial M7 version to staging. > Be sure to check the reports (based on staging) to get as much cleaned up > as possible before M7: * > > **http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/*<http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/> > > In all, the following files have disabled repositories or features. It > looks worse than it is, but we need to get in completely "enabled" in the > next few days (or, remove it, if its some old thing that should not even be > there any longer). > > amp.b3aggrcon > birt.b3aggrcon > emf-compare.b3aggrcon > equinox.b3aggrcon > jetty.b3aggrcon > linuxtools.b3aggrcon > mat.b3aggrcon > mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon > mft.b3aggrcon > rap.b3aggrcon > riena.b3aggrcon > scout.b3aggrcon > virgo.b3aggrcon > > As always questions and clarifications are welcome. > > Thanks everyone, > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list* > > **[email protected]*<[email protected]> > * > > **https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev*<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev> > > > [attachment "laurent_goubet.vcf" deleted by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM] > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected]* > **https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev*<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev> > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > <graycol.gif>_______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > ______________________________ > Miles T. Parker > Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop > http://tasktop.com > Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo > Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP > http://milesparker.blogspot.com > skype: milestravisparker > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
