Just wondering here...

but since LTS has the a goal of having a set of set points in time (the
existing releases) that is maintained into the future, doesn't it make
sense to have LTS be the primary stakeholder for the
entire simultaneous release concept (maybe they are?)

and then if, as Doug is calling for here, there was interest in a more fast
moving, ideally generally bug free but sometimes glitchy IDE experience
then folks can download and update their editor based on that stream?  And
have a durable update repository that isn't getting smoked, renamed, or
what have you that people can just use for years on end.  A bit like how
ubuntu lets you have your stable and unstable streams that you can keep
updated from

As for version resolution...I thought one of the points of osgi was to
allow multiple runtime versions of stuff to coexist so from a repository
perspective, let them update whatever they want and downstream projects
that trust their upstreams can have open version ranges and those that
don't can take a more deliberate approach.

I am aware I am probably trivializing much of the osgi experience there,
but really...from a users perspective of Eclipse (which I am speaking from)
I would like to just be able to flip a switch in the IDE and have it notify
me of updates, download in the background and either update automagically
or restart the IDE as needed and not care about adding p2 update repo this
for that thing or download Milestone X or Y or whatever...

cheers,
jesse


--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mike Milinkovich <
mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org> wrote:

>
> > On the flip side, we need to evaluate the benefits of more frequent
> releases to
> > see if it's worth it.
>
> Completely agree. My assumption is that some projects will want to ship
> more
> often, and some will not. We have a large community, and one size rarely
> fits all. A strategy that can accommodate differing requirements will be
> necessary.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to