> LTS currently relies upon the existence of a simultaneous release as its > starting point. The LTS working group would be a very poor replacement for > the Planning Council in running the simultaneous release. For example, one > of the major features of the Planning Council is that it has representation > on it from each of the PMCs. The LTS working group steering committee does > not. > > ok, fair enough...but if the LTS has been investing so much time and effort into building a process for being able to release updates to simultaneous releases, will they assume that burden from the Planning Council eventually? Will that effort be rolled back into the simultaneous release process that the Planning Council currently takes care of?
maybe a slight off topic, if so my apologies jesse > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
