Thanks a good question Mike. Obviously monthly was what Konstantin originally suggested. I think it's good in that it's forcing us to re-think some of our assumptions. In the end, if we choose 6 weeks, or 8 times per year -- with careful consideration to Holidays, etc.. -- that's fine. But if the use of the term monthly is helping us break some of our mental road-blocks, than that's a good thing(tm).
Cheers, Ian On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mike Milinkovich < mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org> wrote: > ** ** > > Just out of curiousity, is there a reason why people keep mentioning > monthly, when there is a long-established 6-week cadence? **** > > ** ** > > Maybe we can address these issues by having a few of these monthly builds > get promoted as 'Package Releases'. **** > -- R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
