Hi folks,
The snapshot is ready https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 Thanks, Jonah On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part > thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. > > I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has > slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) > have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). > > The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that > fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE > package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. > > To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test > that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further > 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. > > RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of > everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). > > Any suggestions are very welcome. > > Thanks, > Jonah > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer >> is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be >> built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps >> in all project, though, in quite late time. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ondre/Nitin, >>> >>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 >>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think >>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ondrej, >>>> >>>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from >>>> reddeer. >>>> >>>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 >>>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j >>>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found >>>> >>>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is >>>> unintentionally breaking WTP. >>>> >>>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there >>>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a >>>> resolution of WTP first. >>>> >>>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jonah >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ~~~ >>>> Jonah Graham >>>> Kichwa Coders >>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this >>>>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can >>>>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my >>>>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle >>>>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. >>>>> >>>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in >>>>> release, not sure if that can help. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console >>>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ondrej, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 >>>>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from >>>>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Markus, >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you >>>>>> mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many >>>>>> projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, >>>>>> wtp, >>>>>> and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 >>>>>> release entirely. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nitin, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is >>>>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP >>>>>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, >>>>>>> right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1]: >>>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer < >>>>>>> mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially >>>>>>>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 >>>>>>>> repository for building. I will try that now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and >>>>>>>> is now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be >>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>> to remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* >>>>>>>>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done >>>>>>>>> that I >>>>>>>>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means >>>>>>>>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 >>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel >>>>>>>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> jetty 10 from other sources. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution >>>>>>>>> to ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the >>>>>>>>> simrel >>>>>>>>> please. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has >>>>>>>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 >>>>>>>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel >>>>>>>>> output repo! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> Jonah >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
