Hi folks, Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's contribution based on the jetty snapshot.
I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the source bundle issue that Sravan identified. If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to Jetty so they can make their release. Thanks Jonah ~~~ Jonah Graham Kichwa Coders www.kichwacoders.com On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti <sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is issue > in the source bundles as they contain temporary files > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 > > > > Thanks > > Sravan > > > > *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 > *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from > RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status > on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > The snapshot is ready > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 > > > > Thanks, > > Jonah > > > > On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part > thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. > > > > I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has > slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) > have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). > > > > The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that > fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE > package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. > > > > To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test > that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further > 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. > > > > RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of > everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). > > > > Any suggestions are very welcome. > > > > Thanks, > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer > is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be > built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps > in all project, though, in quite late time. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Hi Ondre/Nitin, > > > > https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 > decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think > it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. > > > > Thanks > > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > Hi Ondrej, > > > > AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from > reddeer. > > > > 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 > (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j > [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found > > > > So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally > breaking WTP. > > > > Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there is > actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a > resolution of WTP first. > > > > I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. > > > > Thanks, > > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this > time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can > be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my > side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle > this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. > > I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release, > not sure if that can help. > > [1]: > https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console > > [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Ondrej, > > > > I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 > site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from > Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. > > > > Markus, > > > > Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean > that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects, > then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and > reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release > entirely. > > > > Nitin, > > > > I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is > still publishing slf4j 2.0. > > > > Jonah > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP > requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I > guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? > > > > [1]: > https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> > wrote: > > Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because > the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for > building. I will try that now. > > > > slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now > referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to > remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. > > > > Thanks > > Markus > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks > Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't > know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse > Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. > > > > However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel because > they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or jetty 10 > from other sources. > > > > Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to > ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel > please. > > > > As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has Jetty > 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed to > webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo! > > > > Thank you, > > Jonah > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
