Indeed. Just because the server can be modularized thus blocking any other new development whilst that takes place doesn't mean it's a good idea. I for one frown on the idea of making the server slower and blocking other development.
--- Yann Chachkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If this range of languages is increased, there is > a danger that it would include languages outside the > range of competence of the existing developers, or > outside the range of languages which are well > supported on some of crossfire's target platforms. > > > That is true - I'm not myself in favor of a system > in which several languages would get used. > Introducing something else than C in the server code > would definitely create a lot of issues, and isn't > something I'd like to see without a prior > discussion. > > Probably the best rules is: code in C, and if you > *really* think another language is needed, then ask > the mailing list first, so the case gets discussed. > Just because it can technically be done doesn't mean > it is a good idea. > _______________________________________________ > crossfire mailing list > crossfire@metalforge.org > http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire > > > > > _______________________________________________ > crossfire mailing list > crossfire@metalforge.org > http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire