Yann Chachkoff wrote: >>If someone want's to create a RPG engine crossfire, in my opinion, is not >>the place to do it. >> >> >It is the exact place where to discuss about what we want to do with >Crossfire, being maintaining it in its current state, expanding it or making >it more generic. See the description of the list: "This list is used for >general discussion and questions, answers, and latest changes and updates." >This is general discussion around the game, so that discussion is perfectly in >sync with that definition. If you don't like it, don't answer to it - simple >as that. > > I agree that the code structure could be improved, and some level of modularization/separation of parts would be good if done with care. However, personally I do not see any real value in expanding it to a generic game engine. That said, I don't see any harm in that either, so long as it is done carefully. IMHO, creating a generic game engine is not a good goal for the project, however isn't necessarily a harmful as a side affect of increased modularization. I feel that modularization should be done (gradually and with care), to improve maintainability, *not* to create a generic game engine, though that would not be harmful to come as a side affect.
Alex Schultz _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
