"William H. Geiger III" wrote: > >What they _should_ do is use OpenSSL and work on that, instead of > >reinventing the wheel. > > IIRC the OpenSSL project was not accepting code from US sources. Has this policy >changed? Hmmm. Weeding out cruft from my mailbox and I found this. Looks like I didn't answer. Yes, this policy has changed - OpenSSL now accepts US contributions so long as they have obeyed the export laws. BTW, I still think the best way to obey them is to subscribe the BXA to every CVS mailing list in the world :-) Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." Robert Woodruff
- [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release] William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release] Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release... William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Rel... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1... William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 B... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3... William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release... William H. Geiger III
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Rel... Rich Salz
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Rel... Ben Laurie
- Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release] Jeffrey Altman