On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:36 PM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: > On 2012-02-27 3:35 AM, Jon Callas wrote: >> Remember what I said -- they're law enforcement and border >> control. In their world, Truecrypt is the same thing as a >> suitcase with a hidden compartment. When someone crosses a >> border (or they get to perform a search), hidden >> compartments aren't exempt. They get to search them. > > Hidden compartment? What hidden compartment? If I have one, > you are welcome to search it. Go knock yourselves out.
Well, we're already considerably OT, but since the moderator seems to be letting this thread play itself out, I use that to segue to a related topic on a new proposed Ohio law and hidden compartments. [I just literally finished posting this to my G+ account moments ago, but will repost here rather than making all you you go to GooglePlus.] Ohio Gov. John Kasich is advocating a law that would make it a 4th-degree felony to own any vehicle equipped with hidden compartments. Conviction under this proposed law could mean up to 18 months in jail and a potential $5,000 fine. So someone please tell me why the ACLU is not jumping all over this? I just don't see how this law is a good thing. It seems to me that this could trap a lot of innocent people. Imagine the following scenario: A drug dealer whose car has a secret compartment decides to get some new wheels so he trades in is old car for a hot new one to some legitimate auto dealer. The auto dealer does not know this person is a drug dealer so they have no reason to suspect anything. Sometime later, the car dealer sells the car to someone. That "someone" then happens to get in an accident where they get rear ended. The ensuing damage reveals a hidden compartment such as that described in the Columbus Dispatch article (see below). The officer on the scene of the accident notices the secret compartment, and even though there are no drugs present, decides to arrest the driver of the damaged car solely because she or he can observe the secret compartment. Thereby some innocent person is charged with a fourth degree felony and at least has to go through a bunch of legal hoops to clear his or her name. Now how is this a _good_ thing? So much for the presumed innocent until proven guilty. The original Columbus Dispatch article is here in case anyone wishes to read it: <http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/02/25/secret-compartments-could-get-drivers-busted.html> -kevin -- Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/ "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We *cause* accidents." -- Nathaniel Borenstein _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography