Gmail only keeps in the clear what you leave in the clear. s/a hostile act/less useful to power users than filter but notify
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:48 PM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: > On 2013-05-21 3:08 AM, Mark Seiden wrote: > >> (i know that at least jake and ian understand all the nuances here, >> probably better than me.) >> >> bus still, i would like you to consider, for a moment, this question: >> >> suppose there were a service that intentionally wanted to protect >> recipients of communications >> from malicious traffic? when i was at $big_provider, i spent an awful >> lot of time and energy >> communicating with colleagues and sharing threat intelligence about bad >> guys. >> > > Gmail is very efficient at filtering out malicious traffic. It also spies > on all its customers and keeps all their mail in the clear forever. > > For this reason I use mail services that perform absolutely no filtering, > and do my own filtering. > > If I get filtered, I want to know it. Furtive filtering is a hostile act. > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/**mailman/listinfo/cryptography<http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography> > -- Kyle Creyts Information Assurance Professional BSidesDetroit Organizer
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
