Nicholas Morgan wrote: > Thanks Bob for your replay. I just don't get why this is not a > priority. > > Does this mean that no one is going to do anything about this? I > think this is a big deal and something that should be worked on as > core for every browser. Not solving this problem just costs everyone > more money, more time, more bandwidth, less accessibility, etc, etc.. > > Why doesn't any one care about this? Am I totally off by asking for > something like this? Is anyone working on figuring this out? >
Two points. 1) PLEASE don't quote entire messages. Several thousand subscribers don't need to see the whole thread over and over again. BTW, most of us prefer bottom posting. Both are mentioned in the list policies. 2) Some provision for loadable fonts will be in one of the CSS3 modules. The W3C CSS Working Group (I'm a member) has been discussing this recently. The feature is not yet in any draft, but it is almost certain to occur in some form. As to why it's not a priority, demand drives almost all W3C activity. There are many other things that people have asked for more frequently than downloadable fonts. CSS3 work under construction: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.html -- Bob Easton Accessibility Matters: http://access-matters.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
