At 7:02 AM +0200 9/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Georg:
>I recommend body {font-size: 100%;}.
I've seen 100.1% stated -- is there any real advantage in doing that?
>/* all values below are suggestions */
>
>h1 {font-size: 145%;}
>h2 {font-size: 132%;}
>h3 {font-size: 125%;}
>h4 {font-size: 115%;}
>h5 {font-size: 102%;}
>h6 {font-size: 100%;}
>p, ul, ol, blockquote, pre {font-size: 100%;}
I was looking around last week for something like
this. It would seem to me that there should be an
"official" recommended ratio size for H1 to H6
tags, but I couldn't find any. Thanks for
providing your suggestion.
As for using em's, I commonly use them
exclusively for entire layouts. I think it's
important for web sites to scale properly (i.e.,
zoom cooperative). Of course, this is my
preference because my eyesight isn't as good as
it used to be and I often zoom sites a couple of
zoom levels above defaults. I hate it when I see
large text confined to small static spaces.
Here's an example of what I mean by zoom cooperative:
http://www.php1.net/b/speech/
Now only does this site zoom well (according to
me), but it's part of my new deliver content via
speech thing. I would be interested in what you,
and others on this list, think.
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
