tedd wrote: > I've seen 100.1% stated -- is there any real advantage in doing that?
That "slightly larger than 100%" value was used to fix a bug in a few old browser-versions - Opera amongst others IIRC. Through testing I haven't found the need to fix any bugs that way in any browser for the last two years or so, so I use 100% flat. > It would seem to me that there should be an "official" recommended > ratio size for H1 to H6 tags, but I couldn't find any. Following official or "official" recommendations too closely may, IMO, reduce our ability to make individual - case-based - design choices. Having a number of well-working alternatives around would be good though. > Here's an example of what I mean by zoom cooperative: > > http://www.php1.net/b/speech/ > > Now only does this site zoom well (according to me), but it's part of > my new deliver content via speech thing. I would be interested in > what you, and others on this list, think. That's what I call "em sized" and some call "elastic". It's working as a "px sized page zoomed in Opera", and solves the problem you describe. It may require horizontal scrolling if font is resized too many steps on a narrow window/screen though. I prefer a variant I call "Conditional Elastic", where window-width is the limit. It's kind of a compromise. Example: <http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_12a.html> Horizontal scrolling is rarely necessary, but text and stuff may be confined to narrow spaces if the end user doesn't provide a reasonable amount of window-width for it to scale on when subjected to font resizing. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
