Rahul Gonsalves wrote: > On 31-Oct-07, at 3:04 AM, David Laakso wrote: > > >> Rahul Gonsalves wrote: >> >>> http://rahulgonsalves.com/WDD/ >>> >> Stress test it and the problems may become more apparent: font- >> scaling >> at +3 in a compliant browser; and, text-size "largest" in the IE's, >> for >> example (the solutions are often elusive but well worth the effort to >> correct them). >> > > This has been one of my problems. I am partial to large header > images, which often entail using a fixed-width layout, which, as you > say, begins to show problems when the font-size is increased. What > would you suggest? Sizing containers in em's? I'm not sure where to > start... > > > > Best, > - Rahul. >
Rahul, My reference to stress font scaling has *more to do with height than width* (although you may get a little horizontal crossover among the three adjacent lower columns). When the fonts are scalled the image containing text should drive the text block beneath it down, rather than overlapping it as it does now. I did not then, nor I have I now, looked into exactly what is restricting the veritcal height and causing that /vertical overlap/. As far as the accessibility matters are concerned, they may be questions of opinion best directed to WSG or dropped if you ae comfortable with what you have. Best, ~uncle david -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
