David Laakso wrote:
> Luc wrote:
>
>> David , just a quick remark:
>>
>> wouldn't it be better to use another alternative for the e-mail? Just
>> to "try" to limit a bit of spam attack...
>>
>
> **** off-list reply ***
>
>
> I am not sure what a spam attack has to do with the nature and purpose
> of the CSS-D list. My understanding is this list deals with the "
> practical application of CSS."
>
Well, let's try to bring it back in topic.
What I've done is to add some <del> elements with "no-spam" legends,
hiding them later on with CSS (and using JS to make it an actual link).
This may not be the best approach, but it's, like everything else, just
another try to avoid/minimize spam.
Rafael.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
