David Laakso wrote:
> Bruno Fassino wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David Laakso wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>><http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/nav.html>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>Interesting? Nah. More like my sister: twisted. I have no control over the
>>>markup (or use of small-caps).
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So you cannot reset small-caps (for IE only) and use something like:
>>#nav ul li a {
>> font-variant: normal;
>> text-transform: uppercase;
>> font-size: 0.75em;
>>}
>>
>>The problem would disappear and the look would be the same (I don't
>>think there exist common fonts with real "small-caps", so what you get
>>are anyway uppercases in a smaller size, someone will correct me if
>>I'm wrong...)
>>
>>Bruno
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Granted.
>
> My original proposal for all browsers was fake small-caps for all
> browsers like so (no problem in any browser, no line-height needed).
>
> #nav ul li a {
> text-transform: uppercase;
> font-size: 80%;
> }
>
> However, the person it is being done for still lives and breathes hot-metal
> (literally). He's gonna have small-caps even if it means defying reality to
> get 'em.
>
>
>
would it be possible to get the exact small-caps face that the client
wants and use that name as the first one in the font-face list? would
something like
font-face {
"Fontin Sans small-caps", arial, sans-serif
}
be acceptable?
Sandy
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
