> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris F.A. Johnson [mailto:ch...@cfajohnson.com] > There were 12 errors at validator.w3.org. >
I conceded that - when I posted my initial question, I ~did~ state there were validation errors. But if you'd looked at all 12 of them, every one of them was related to the navigation menu, which was exactly the reason I was posting here. I did not know ~what~ was wrong, what was causing the validation issues. I was asking for help. Paul's response about the improper syntax was the issue (though, unfortunately, fixing that caused the menu to die in Firefox). > > Regarding your question about making the page too small for you to read, I > > am open to any teaching you wish to offer. As I learned CSS, I read over and > > over that the "right" way to size fonts is to set the page font size to > > 62.5% and then increase using ems. > > When I was learning CSS I read over and over that setting the font > size to 62.5% was not only wrong, but the technique was thoroughly > ridiculed. > > The correct size is 100%, i.e., the user's preferred font size. > Well then I suppose I've been ridiculed. Again, I'm here to learn. And I ~thought~ that was the right way to do it. I do the best I can learning, I'm trying very hard to learn the standards and produce the best sites that I can. Of course I know that you can't believe everything you read on the internet, but I'd seen more than a few tutorials that showed how to size fonts this way. I will go back and read more about it and learn the right way. I'm sorry if my posting was rather a nuisance - I have found this list to be very informative and appreciate any help that I can get. Kym ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
