If having valid stylesheets is important, one could simply apply zoom using javascript: object.style.zoom="1";
~C On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Thierry Koblentz <n...@tjkdesign.com> wrote: > Hi Georg, > >> Myself, I use any property/value that gets the job done, whenever I >> need >> to trigger hasLayout. Loss of "validity" because of proprietary IE CSS >> isn't more problematic than use of some "mos-", "webkit-" or "o-" >> proprietary CSS ... IMO. > > I do not care much about CSS validation, but I see a difference between > using a proprietary property like zoom and using vendor-specific extensions > [1]. > Because these are part of the grammar, they are known to the CSS parser: > > '-' + vendor identifier + '-' + meaningful name > '_' + vendor identifier + '-' + meaningful name > > But I agree with you, I don't see this as "problematic". > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords > > -- > Regards, > Thierry > www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
