On Thursday, 8 November 2012, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > In no circumstances should the validator ever report as correct > a document that deviates one iota from the published specification; > once it does that, even for just one special case, it ceases to be > a validator and becomes just another piece of pragmatic junk. >
Hear hear. The validator is very clear on its single, inflexible and unambiguous purpose: ruthlessly determine whether or not code is specification conformant. No more, no less. Meanwhile for those who want something else out of it (by which I refer to the silent majority who don't give two hoots about specification-validity but live and die by the pragmatism of their junk ;), you're looking in the wrong place. You may find what you're looking for here, though: http://csslint.net/ -- Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carr...@gmail.com +44 7429 177278 barneycarroll.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
