I think this may be because the 0% and 100% are key words for the selectors and 
the css animation is confused?
Its probably trying to find the selector -120%. But I am guessing here. 
Does look like others have run across this and determined it was a bug.

Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com



On Aug 26, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Kuzeko Web Design - Matteo Lissandrini wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying a simple animation:  long text inside a box scrolling up.
> Since I have multiple boxes they have different length, so I am trying to
> use keyframe animation with top positioning with percent value.
> 
> Please find an example here:
> http://jsfiddle.net/sKEnv/1/
> 
> As you can see the first example is using em units and it works, the second
> it uses percent values and it doesn't.
> 
> Am I doing something wrong or is simply not possible to do this with
> percent values?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> ------------------
> 
> Kuzeko
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 October 2012 18:38, Gabriele Romanato <gabriele.roman...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> I generally tend to use CSS3 animations in mobile web apps whenever it's
>> possible, but sometimes I get stuck when the app's requirements are too
>> complex. So I usually mix up basic CSS3 animations with JS routines in
>> order to not end up with messy markup as in many Codrops examples (you
>> know, form elements used to create slideshow effects and so on).
>> 
>> What I don't really know is if there's a common best practice to follow
>> when creating complex web apps which feature a lot of advanced effects.
>> CSS3 animations are faster than JS animations, but when your boss or your
>> client has a Flash-like idea about how your effects should be made, well
>> it's difficult to me to stick to pure CSS animations.
>> 
>> What's your approach when you design complex web apps?
>> I'd really like to get some hints about the role of CSS animations in that
>> context.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Gabriele
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
>> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
>> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to