You don't. You use JavaScript or even better. jQuery. IMO. jQuery would handle what your wanting very nicely. I for one avoid animations with CSS. But that is just me I assume.
Best, Karl Sent from losPhone On Aug 27, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Kuzeko Web Design - Matteo Lissandrini <w...@kuzeko.com> wrote: > Ok, thank you. > But then, the question becomes: how do I accomplish that effect with only > CSS? > I.e., text of different length scrolling vertically from end to end without > hardcoding px or a predefined height?? > > Thanks > > > ------------------ > > Kuzeko > > > > On 27 August 2013 22:30, Eric <e...@minerbits.com> wrote: > >> ** >> It's more of a misbehavior than a bug. The Moz engineering team probably >> just decided not to go back and change it after the spec was finalized. >> It's sort of like how they're the only UA that doesn't support display: >> run-in. Back int he '90s a bug was opened on it and loads of note by senior >> engineers stating why they should support (one saying that it's >> embarrassing for FF to be the only UA not to support) it's still sitting >> there unassigned over 15yrs later. That's just how engineering teams work. >> >> I would suggest that you don't use percentage as a unit of measure in CSS >> animations. >> >> Eric >> >> >>> On August 27, 2013 at 8:09 AM Kuzeko Web Design - Matteo Lissandrini < >> w...@kuzeko.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thank you all for the answers, but now I am really confused. >>> So is this supposed to do so or is a bug? >>> >>> Can you fork my example and show me how to have this work properly if >> this >>> is possible? >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------ >>> >>> Kuzeko >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 August 2013 08:28, Philippe Wittenbergh <e...@l-c-n.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Le 27 août 2013 à 14:52, "L. David Baron" <dba...@dbaron.org> a écrit >> : >>>> >>>>> Many of the other references in the CSS spec to things that are >>>>> based on the height of the containing block explicitly say that if >>>>> the containing block's computed height is 'auto', then the >>>>> percentage is as well. See, for example: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#the-height-property >>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#min-max-heights >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#position-props , however, >>>>> does not say that, and you shouldn't infer it from the same thing >>>>> being stated elsewhere. >>>>> >>>>> The working group explicitly decided *not* to change this in 2009; >>>>> see: >>>>> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-134 >>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0056.html >>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0092.html >>>> >>>> Oh :-(. I had forgotten about that resolution (which I find >> inconsistent >>>> with the way height and min-max-height work). Thing is, no browser >> released >>>> as of today, including Presto-Opera, implement this, even for a very >> basic >>>> test case [*] (I can't test IE 11beta, though). But Presto based Opera >> and >>>> Gecko manage to animated it. Bizarre. >>>> >>>> [*] http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/top-perc.html >>>> >>>> Gecko bug report is here: >>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260348 >>>> >>>> Philippe >>>> -- >>>> Philippe Wittenbergh >>>> http://l-c-n.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] >>>> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d >>>> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ >>>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html >>>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] >>> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d >>> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ >>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html >>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
