I'll raise my hand and say I'm against it. Not because I have a problem with CSS pre-processors rather because this is a CSS list. Pre-processors are simply a tool used to write CSS in a more programmatic way and then 'compile' it CSS for use by the UA.
I just think it would be a thick layer of static on this list. Just my US$0.02 worth. Eric > On April 24, 2014 at 11:46 AM "Andrew C. Johnston" <attyjohns...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Hello All: > > I have been a bit busy and haven't been keeping up, how does the list feel > about discussions involving LESS, SASS and SCSS? I have a Sass project where I > have to make some changes and feel a little lost. > > Not sure if I would have any specific question to ask here, but is the list > open to these technologies as well? > > Cheers! > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
