> On Apr 25, 2014, at 1:43 AM, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > Eric wrote: > >> I'll raise my hand and say I'm against it. Not because I have a problem with >> CSS >> pre-processors rather because this is a CSS list. Pre-processors are simply a >> tool used to write CSS in a more programmatic way and then 'compile' it > > I agree, and each is presumably different; a separate list for such > things (or no list at all) would allow this list to retain its focus. > >
Possible Holy War as well... ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
