On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:53 AM, John <j...@coffeeonmars.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't heard any arguments about not using rem for anything but
>> font-size until this thread. I've only heard that it's no different
>> than using em, except for the lack of the compounding issue associated
>> with em. And that's a really good thing.
>
> Such as that problem I had yesterday, where em values seemed to double in the 
> spot where I had an h2 enclosed by my h1?
>
> John

That's what it looked like to me, yes.


-- 

Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to