On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:53 AM, John <j...@coffeeonmars.com> wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I haven't heard any arguments about not using rem for anything but >> font-size until this thread. I've only heard that it's no different >> than using em, except for the lack of the compounding issue associated >> with em. And that's a really good thing. > > Such as that problem I had yesterday, where em values seemed to double in the > spot where I had an h2 enclosed by my h1? > > John
That's what it looked like to me, yes. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/