> Le 3 mai 2015 à 01:02, David Hucklesby <huckle...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Ah, yes. Did not know about that. Confused by the fact Chrome *does* apply the > padding.
Yes, Chrome / Blink (and Webkit) is not spec compliant for this (and many other things flexbox related). They unprefixed the flexbox code when they forked from Webkit) in a fit of holier-than-thou mentality. > >> >> PS - don’t forget to add the -webkit- prefixed properties / values for >> Safari. >> > > Actually am applying this on top of inline-blocks via @supports ( flex-wrap: > wrap ) to prevent old Android versions using it. So Safari is locked out > anyway. What issue (and which old Android) are you seeing? And, you lock out IE 10/11 as well? Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
