-Caveat Lector-
(Parts of this are in reference to the message being responded to in the
message quoted)
Exactly which form of communism are you referring to? The failed
authoritarian right-wing Russian and Chinese models or the idealistic
left-wing view (I hate this whole Aristolean dualistic thing, but it
seems to be the model used here) that has never been seen in any world
government to the best of my knowledge? They are definitely not the
same thing. I think that a strong argument can be made that the Chinese
version of communism is actually a very conservative and extreme
right-wing (if we have to label these things so) organization. Also, to
the best of my knowledge the presidential impeachment proceedings have
nothing to do with Mena. I'm not arguing that isn't guilty in the whole
Mena fiasco, I feel that he may be, but the impeachment proceedings just
don't have anything to do with it (yet at least). He cannot be
impeached due to Mena if no one ever brings it up in the proceedings.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenn Thomas [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] "Heads Up": Bill Clinton Is Finished
-Caveat Lector-
> Why is it that every time something is posted about Commie
Lover Clinton
> all we hear about is Bush and Reagan.
Which part of the Mena operation do you not understand?
> Seems to be a conspiracy to keep any
> topic off Clinton and some people on this list said they were
"conservative."
> Clinton is as far to the left as anyone can get without being
called
> "Comrade." "IF" the media is owned by the Republicans.... why
does it support
> Clinton all the time?
The media is controlled by the same corporate interests that
control the
Republicans and the Democrats. That political reality cares
little about these
"left" and "conservative" word games.
> Reagan and Bush have nothing to do with a discussion about
Clinton,
You can only say this by ignoring the facts.
> they were not subject to impeachment no matter what you
say...Clinton is.
The occupant of the White House is fully aware of the
non-electoral, extra-legal
processes that put him there. I don't cheer Clinton's weaseling
out of impeachment
(and he will; no way to get 2/3s in the Senate), and I almost
admire your naivete
in insisting that it was different with Reagan/Bush. But at the
half-century mark,
that naivete can only be willful.
kt
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
